In a world where everyone’s pushing their own version of reality, let me share with you about the most valuable currency you’ll ever possess: truth. In this game of life, truth is your weapon—sharper than any blade, more powerful than any connection. Truth is raw. Truth is what cuts through the noise.
Every moment, our senses are assaulted by notifications, news cycles, social media trends, and the unrelenting hum of a world obsessed with progress. Artificial intelligence, in particular, has introduced unprecedented levels of automation and personalization. Algorithms predict what we want before we know it ourselves, curating a world that feels tailored to our desires yet strangely out of our control. While these tools promise efficiency and convenience, they also amplify the pace of life. The cycle of technological innovation is so fast that what feels cutting-edge today becomes outdated tomorrow, leaving us perpetually striving to catch up.
This noise isn’t just external; it’s internal. The constant influx of information keeps our minds in overdrive. We struggle to process, let alone prioritize, what truly matters. We lose the ability to distinguish between what is meaningful and what is merely urgent. In this chaos, the very fabric of our humanity—our ability to think deeply, to connect genuinely, to find peace—is at risk of being drowned out. Our world speaks of celebrating uniqueness, yet beneath its shining words lies the shadow of conformity. Trends seduce our desires, the media whispers its half-truths, and the weight of social pressure bends our moral compass. Even the cry for individuality often becomes an echo as we follow phony curated paths that are paved by others. Our culture loves to sell the idea of uniqueness, and no one profits from it more than the companies and political campaigns that fuel the system. They promise individuality through products and lifestyles, painting false pictures of freedom and self-expression. Social media amplifies this, with algorithms pushing the next big trend while making us believe we are discovering something special or rare. Our tastes, aspirations, and choices are shaped not by our convictions but by subtle, calculated strategies aimed at making us feel unique while keeping us tethered to the same system as everyone else.
What we need, now more than ever, is clarity. Something that cuts through the noise. Not another app, tool, or fleeting solution, but a grounding truth that transcends the chaos. But what exactly is truth? It certainly seems like an overused word. What exactly is truth? It’s not just some vague idea or an opinion that shifts with the crowd. Truth is like gold—precious, enduring, and already there, waiting to be uncovered. You don’t make it up or bend it to your will. Like gravity, truth exists whether you acknowledge it or not. It’s been pulling things down long before Newton ever gave it a name. Just because you don’t know something doesn’t mean it’s not real. Truth doesn’t care about your ignorance, your beliefs, or where you come from. It just is. Truth is universal. It doesn’t matter if you’re in the Bronx or Tokyo, in the present or 1,000 years ago. Some things—like 2+2=4—remain constant. Truth doesn’t shift with your language, your culture, or your zip code. Opinions can change, trends can come and go, but real truth? That stays rock solid, unshaken by time or circumstance. In a world where everything feels uncertain—where people switch allegiances, change their minds, and follow the loudest voice in the room—truth is the anchor. It’s the one thing that doesn’t flinch or adapt to the chaos around it. Your neighborhood might change, your attitude can shift, and your relationships might falter, but principles like loyalty, integrity, and love being morally good are truths. The crowd might forget them; you might forget them, but that doesn’t make them any less true. Truth doesn’t need your permission to exist. It’s not sitting around, waiting for you to validate it. You can believe whatever you want, but belief doesn’t create reality. Step off a building thinking you can fly, and gravity will remind you otherwise. Smooth lies may sound convincing, but they’re still lies. A rough truth might sting, but it’s still the truth. In a world overwhelmed by information and opinions, rediscovering and clinging to truth is like finding treasure. It’s what cuts through the noise, grounding us in something real, unchanging, and eternal. Truth isn’t just a concept—it’s the bedrock of everything we know. And it’s there, waiting, for anyone bold enough to seek it.
When people try to tell you that “truth is just whatever you feel,” It’s like saying there are no rules in this game of life—but that statement itself is a rule. If everything’s just an opinion, then even saying “everything’s an opinion” is just another opinion. Attempting to argue that nothing is ever absolutely true is self-defeating. The very act of claiming that no truth is absolute contradicts itself before the sentence is even finished. Some things are merely opinions—and that’s fine—like personal preferences for Pepsi over Dr. Pepper. Neither position is inherently wrong; they reflect individual tastes. However, there are facts—objective truths that exist independently of our feelings; for instance, they are both made of liquid, and they both can appropriately be considered soda. If last night you were out spending money at the club, living large, and today you find yourself broke and regretful, your feelings have changed, but the facts of what occurred the previous evening remain the same. Your current emotions don’t erase the reality of what happened. If someone were to domestically abuse a loved one, the anger you would feel is not based on culture, personal preference, or opinion. It’s a deep, righteous anger rooted in a fundamental understanding of right and wrong. You don’t need to be told that what’s happening is unjust—you know it instinctively because there’s an objective truth at play: it is wrong to harm others, particularly those who are vulnerable. If truth were subjective, if there were no objective standard of right and wrong, we would have no real basis to say that actions like domestic violence are wrong. Without an unchanging moral truth, there would be no way to distinguish between what’s justifiable anger and what’s a chemical overreaction. Without truth, we would be left with a world where any form of harm could be justified based on personal feelings or cultural norms. But in reality, we understand that certain actions—like the abuse of a loved one—are objectively wrong. This objective truth gives us the moral clarity to not only feel anger but to act upon it, advocating for justice and protecting the innocent. Without this unwavering standard, society would have no firm ground on which to stand when it comes to moral matters.
The argument that “you only believe what you believe because of where you grew up” is a convenient excuse for avoiding independent thought. While our background certainly shapes us, it does not define us. People raised in difficult circumstances can and do rise above them. Individuals from impoverished or troubled environments become doctors, scientists, and leaders. They use their skills to step outside the mindset they were given. Children raised in devoutly religious families may later adopt atheism. Your upbringing may influence you, but it does not have to dictate your destiny. If we were all merely products of our environment, change would be impossible. But people change all the time—choosing to reject the lessons of their past and pursue different paths. That is the power of personal agency and free will. Moreover, the assertion that someone’s beliefs are strictly the result of their culture often reveals an internal contradiction. After all, that very statement is influenced by the speaker’s own cultural context. Culture shapes our worldview, but it does not control us. We each have the capacity to decide what we believe, regardless of our origins. If we were to accept that “whatever my culture says is all there is,” we would be unable to challenge injustices, no matter how deeply entrenched in society they are. Slavery, child exploitation, and other forms of harm would go unchallenged if we allowed culture to be the sole determinant of morality. Some things are universally wrong, regardless of the societal context in which they occur. You are not a prisoner of your past. You are the captain of your own ship, able to choose your beliefs. Society does not change it for you. The fact that societies throughout history have debated what is right and wrong does not mean that such concepts are entirely subjective. Just because there are disagreements does not alter the underlying truth. The same is true for morality—right and wrong are not subjective or determined by popular opinion. Take John Newton, for example. He was deeply involved in the slave trade, believing it was justified. But over time, he came to recognize the inherent wrongness of his actions. This change did not alter the truth; it was Newton’s own awareness that evolved. He later became a strong abolitionist and wrote “Amazing Grace,” a hymn that reflects his personal transformation and the grace of God. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who, in Nazi Germany, stood against the atrocities being committed by Hitler. While much of society either supported or turned a blind eye to the evil around them, Bonhoeffer took a firm stand against it, even attempting to take action against Hitler. His courage was rooted in an unchanging moral truth, one that he was unwilling to compromise. Martin Luther King Jr. did not seek mere opinion on the matter of racial equality. He proclaimed an undeniable truth—that segregation and discrimination are wrong and that all people are equal, regardless of their race. King knew that his belief in equality was grounded in something far greater than personal opinion; it was rooted in a transcendent moral truth, one that he eloquently expressed while imprisoned in Alabama. Similarly, the disagreement between Jeffrey Dahmer and Mother Teresa over moral issues would not alter the fundamental wrongness of cannibalism. Their conflicting views would only underscore the depth of moral clarity—the truth remains that certain actions are wrong, irrespective of personal beliefs.
To illustrate this further, consider the scale used in weighing products. If the scale were to change every time someone touched it, it would be unreliable. If you allowed customers to decide the weight themselves, it would undermine the integrity of the system. Similarly, when it comes to morality and truth, we need a fixed standard—a consistent measure of what is right and wrong. Without such a standard, society falls into chaos, with each person or group establishing their own rules, leaving everyone vulnerable to exploitation. But when there is an unchanging standard—a moral truth that transcends individual perspectives—there is clarity. We can call out what is crooked, no matter where we stand. Truth, therefore, must be anchored to something unchanging. Just as an ounce is an ounce no matter who is measuring it, truth is constant, regardless of our feelings, cultural influences, or personal biases. Truth remains unaltered by opinion, and it is this steadfastness that allows us to navigate the complexities of life with integrity and purpose.
5 responses to “The Case for Truth”
Well written post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you 🙂
LikeLike
Truth does have objective reality, but our human capacity to perceive it varies widely. On top of this, even the most complete and perfectef human-level grasping of ‘truth’ still is encompassing only a fraction of its reality. This is because of us, of the way we are constituted, not because of the nature of truth, as you have said. One thing which helps us to more closely approach truth is to see things from many different angles and vantage points. Because reality is far richer than our subjective points of view.
Another very helpful, more meditative way to approach truth more initimately is to do enough mathematics to grasp how a proof functions and see with one’s own thinking how the result is arrived at without opinion. Especially this is valuable for non0sensory objects of perception. Because sense perception is fraught with liking/disliking obstacles. This math proof method hints at something special about what thinking is.
A final esoteric way of thinking about truth arises out of esoteric Christianity, as follows. Truth, like Beauty and Goodness, are all three indeed objective realities, even though tastes and opinions wildly contradict around these realms. These three are connected with the Holy Trinity and also with the three principle human cognitive capacities. We were designed to intuit this. Truth is associated with thinking. Beauty with feeling, and lastly goodness with willing or acting. Thinking, and Truth, is the least mysterious of the three, the one to which we have the most access at this point in spiritual evolution. Truth and its objective perception emanates from the Holy Spirit. Feeling and Beauty is a nit more difficult to access in a wide awake fashion. It emanates from the Son. And the most obscured, the creative human principle, willing, which is associated with goodness, emanates from the Father spirit.
Truth — thinking — Holy Spirit
Beauty — feeling — Son
Goodness — willing — Father.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your comment.
While Jesus does call the Holy Spirit the “Spirit of Truth” (John 16:13), truth itself is more broadly associated with God as a whole. Jesus also says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). The idea that Truth is only linked to the Holy Spirit is an oversimplification and not a biblical teaching.
Nowhere in the Bible is Jesus specifically linked to “Beauty” in the way the commenter suggests. If anything, Isaiah 53:2 describes Christ as having “no form or majesty that we should look at Him, and no beauty that we should desire Him.” While beauty is a reflection of God’s creation and can be associated with divine order, the connection between beauty and the Son in the way you describe, is a false interpretation and is not found in Scripture. Likewise, the fruit of the Spirit includes goodness (Galatians 5:22), showing that goodness is not only tied to the Father but is part of the Spirit’s work as well.
Esoteric (hidden, secretive) interpretations of Christianity often rely on mystical, non-biblical traditions rather than clear biblical teaching. True Christianity is not about secret knowledge but about God’s revealed truth in Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16-17).
While logic and reasoning are important tools that can help us understand truth, ultimate truth is found in Christ and God’s Word, not in abstract human reasoning. The Bible teaches that truth is revealed by God (John 17:17), not merely derived from philosophical or mathematical exploration.
You are mixing some reasonable ideas (truth is objective, thinking is important, etc.) with esoteric philosophy that lacks biblical foundation. It leans more on human reasoning and mystical speculation than on God’s revealed Word. Truth, beauty, and goodness are real, but they are reflections of God’s nature as a whole rather than being divided neatly among the Trinity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I did not not say that Truth is only linked to the Holy Spirit. Similarly for the other two universal objective qualities, first enunciated within the ancient Greek knowledge — which of course also originated from esoteric roots.
There are many other misunderstandings within your comment, but I hesitate to catalog them all, since you show an inner resistance to open to deeper insights and cling tight to whatever surface level interpretations of the Bible you subscribe to. As examples, nowhere was it implied that I held that truth is “merely derived from philosophical or mathematical explorations”. It folloes from what you then say, that Truth is revealed by God, that one must then ask: in which manners, and to whom, and by what criteria. Is this revealing strictly limited to a person’s or a sects dogmatic interpreting of the Bible? You seem clearly to hold this view — which is nowhere justified and in fact false — when you characterize esoteric “philosophy” as lacking any Biblical foundation.
You will never come nearer a truer grasping of Christianity with this built-in self-imposed limitation, for it will shut off what you investigate and consider. Which makes it unfortuante that you are choosing to spread your creed abroad.
Esoteric knowledge, which you misconceive, is not reasoning or theorizing or philosophizing, when it is genuine. It is new revealtion. Just as in the OT, generally only prophets received revelations, at present, two millenia after the Bible there exist exception individuals who can obtain present revelations about spiritual reality. And just as in the past, these revelations will be persecuted or discarded by entrenched orthodoxy. You should try to see that esoteric does not mean hidden in any sinister or bogus way. It simply means that one has to work upon oneself to do the necessary things to be able to see esoteric truths. Very mush like in a mundane sense that a text on algebraic topology or a research paper will make no sense to a layman but its inherent esotericism may be revealed with the resolve to deeply study. And as hinted at in the final verse of John’s gospel, much much more is waiting for human development (meaning spiritual cognition) to be revealed than what is written in the Bible. Another indicator clue about this, which may appeal more easily to dogmatic believers are the examples of Christ’s parables wherein he says or demonstrates one thing in one way, aa allegorical imagery, but explains more deeply to those more advanced disciples who are capable of receiving more and who He is in the process of initiating into spiritual vision. That is not the final limit. There is much more. Christianity will become far more than what it seems to be now.
Yes, it is correct that all members of the Trinity share in each other’s being and qualities. Yet, they are a trinity. You must see all three in the idea “God”. I will try once more, simply, to let you see. Humanity, created in the Divine image, carries three principle soul functions or modes of activity (Psyche to the Greeks), which are thinking, feeling, and willing, The fact that these are incorporated via Divine image into man is a reflection of the Trinity in created beings. The earthwise observed, and conceived, ideals of Truth, Beauty, and Goodness are ideals which also reflect and hint at the Trinity in all things on Earth and beyond. In Nature, in human affairs, in history, and in pursuit of arts and knowledge. Meditations upon these things activate within us an intuitive approaching of the members of the Trinity, or can. Because we are so designed. This is independent of creed or religion or belief, because it is objective. That is a way to start understanding. No one implies that any Trinity member is exhaustively so characterized — which would be impossible anyway.
You’ve gotten hung up on Beauty and how you imagine scripture comprehends it in this response. A better way for you might be to dwell upon feeling as associated with approaching Christ in a different way. For Beauty is like an ideal which can only properly be apprehended by us via feeling.
Yet the inseperable blending of all three qualities remains unassaulted here. Even in the Gospels this is reflected, For within the complex being of Christ a Jesus is depicted primarily a spirit of willing within Mark’s gospel. And within Luke’s, primarily a spirit of feeling. And within John, of thinking. (Matthew has a different purpose.) There is great wisdom in this. For all human lives tend to emphasize more strongly one of these three activities and qualities more strongly than the others. And this is the reason why individuals have ‘favorite’ gospels. Because they were composed so as to appeal to certain types. Fare you well!
LikeLiked by 1 person